
The Demand Planner creates a collaborative demand planning process for a cross-functional demand planning process for working towards one common goal.
Benefits of the Arkieva Demand Planner Solution:

Lag Tables: Keeping Data Consistent\ Modern forecasting processes typically use several inputs such as statistical forecasts, sales overrides, marketing overrides, management input, backlog information, and econometric trends to develop a demand plan. The end-result is a combined forecast that functions as a pooling device; much like investors who create diversified portfolios to reduce risk. The quality of this forecast is often determined by a variety of forecast accuracy formulas. These formulas usually compare what was forecasted to what actually happened and report the results in a variety of ways.
Terminology\ Imagine a business that does monthly forecast and that current date is May, 16th 2020. In this case, the following terminology is used:

As evidenced in blue above, it is easier to think in terms of forecast n-periods-out. This is the preferred terminology among practitioners. Similarly, the following table describes the terminology used when looking at historical data. Imagine we have access to various versions of May forecast based on when that forecast was created. Review the table below:

The examples above are for a business that forecasts in monthly buckets. However, if we replace the word month with period, the same idea can be applied to weekly or quarterly forecast as well.
We can define Lag-n forecast (or plan) as forecast for a period that was generated n periods ago (Periods could be days/weeks/months/quarters/years); this is the preferred terminology with practitioners as it allows the same understanding without having to spell out in detail what was meant.
Example: A table called Lag 2 forecast should hold forecast for all months as they were two months prior to that month. So, March’s Lag 2 forecast is as it was finalized at the end of January, April’s is as it was finalized end of February, May’s is at it was finalized end of March and so on.
Get to understand why your forecast lags in your supply chain planning.
{`
`}
Mechanics of lag tables in Arkieva\ For forecasting accuracy purposes, users like to have a table where all historical months have the same lag data (Lag 1, or Lag 2, etc.) for easier understanding of the tables; Arkieva deploys the following table structure for this reason. Each forecast table contains one set of lag numbers per combination, per period. Arkieva tables hold information in the following way:
In Arkieva, all data in these tables is kept relative to the Current Period. The Current Period is identified not as the name of the period, but as a relative order from period 1.
Example: If a database has 36 periods of history, then period month 37 will be the current period; i.e., during the month of April, the 37th period is April; during the month of May, the 37th period in the same database is May; etc.
Every period, the roll forward job will keep the data consistent by copying the numbers to one ID prior; if a roll forward is being run at the end of April, April will now become period 36 instead of period 37. The software will keep data consistent by moving the data from period 37 to period 36 (This is done for all periods).
A similar procedure needs to be performed for the lag tables; this is done in the following way:
Lags in Arkieva examples




